A closer look at the Michaelis decision

The Daily Journal recently published my article examining the recent Supreme Court decision Michaelis v. Superior Court, regarding when a public agency must disclose proposals submitted to it pursuant to a Request for Proposal process. Click here to read the article in Adobe PDF format.

California Supreme Court provides definitive guidance as to when public entities must disclose competitive proposals pursuant to Public Records Act request

     On June 22, 2006, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Michaelis v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1298, clarifying when a public entity must disclose competitive proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal (“RFP”), that are requested pursuant to the Public Records Act (“PRA”). In short, such proposals are exempt from disclosure until the negotiation process is concluded, but must be disclosed prior to a public entity’s final decision on a contract award with sufficient time to allow the public to scrutinize and protest the proposed award. The decision provides definitive guidance applicable to all manner of proposals submitted to public entities that utilize a negotiation process, including proposals for construction related-services such as architectural, engineering, surveying and construction management services. Continue Reading...

AG concludes documents submitted with building permit application are public records

On February 28. 2006, Attorney General Bill Lockyer issued an opinion addressing whether interim documents submitted to a city in support of a building permit application are subject to public inspection under the California Public Records Act. 
Continue Reading...